Friday, November 2, 2007

"Drink and Derive"
Discoveries made on drugs are not invalid. I made some of my best math data while drunk or on psychadelics, and got most of my house clean on amphetamine salts.

Besides, it's statistically accurate.

I believe the cause of 8>9 errors is an inappropriate 4 subfrequency, like in subatomics, that believes an exclusion of 2 is sustainable. This is a belief that 4[-2] is sustainable infinitely, which then supercedes the intelligence. Factually, the 4[-2] is unsustainable. It would just take a long time to overcome. It is like saying two parts of a metaphor are infinitely collusionable. No 2 things are identical to infinity. That is the principle of uniqueness, which is the 10. It is 4[-2] saying there is no 10. No unique experience in which my ability will be overcome.

This math seems to be in the shape of an F, or a billy club with a slightly angled rear handle, centering from the 4 to the 8,9, and 10-13 being shifted. I've seen this shape before in certain military or aggressively tuned men, and portions of society. It is a Maignot Line.

It is unsustainable. The WoT will not end in "success". Controllers will succumb to the libertarian revolution. What consolations can we keep? Voluntary association is part of this freedom. Greater science and technology benefits. A better understanding of culture and 'the' culture is probably evident, and the ability to malleate all of these things to your liking, as they are merely tools and not mandates.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home