Wednesday, December 19, 2007

Ringing, hard as steel.

The balls are the message. The cock is the message's pathway. As much as it is good to have a message that is complex and wonderful to send, it is necessary to be able to broadcast this message. If you have a 12ga shotgun shell, but no shotgun, you're not doing any better than none.

We have all the balls in the world. We've got the ideology and the message up and down. The technology to build a seamless sociological and electrical future exists in spades. The universe has it. But the vehicle to send that message to the vagina of the w/hole world, it does not exist.

http://space.newscientist.com/article/dn13096-et-too-bored-by-earth-transmissions-to-respond.html
Boner-free.


http://www.physorg.com/news117210602.html


The signal we have broadcast is very weak, seemingly, from these antennae and dishes. To respond to such a signal may be simply galactically inappropriate. But here we are, so be. It could be considered rude to mention it or to emphasize the scale.

I would much rather have there be no cock required in this function. To be a race of pure knowledge, such as the grays. They simply have no reproductive organs that are detectable. They likely synthesize DNA for custom journeys, like the BMW/Alfa-Romeo compensating man, they make space craft. And they hide well.

I would like to circumvent the need for being forceful, forcefully pushing two things aside to build that message in the vulnerable and fertile interior. This way of doing things is very aggressive and competitive by nature.

Useful social resources for broadcasting this message. I don't need to use my cock like a cudgel, precisely. I represent those interests as a pr spokesman. You can see from the campaign of 1840 onwards and especially today that this kind of advertising, literally, advertising, is a gross offense. Consider economies and societies that do not advertise, but which have a grand production and a refining point as well. Their procedures for doing so are to be a model we should consider.

Much of today's society seems to be without cock, yet having balls, from a social and mental point of view. If you don't get it, perhaps you're missing an ovary upstairs. How to deal with not getting the message in the hole? Is it a refraction from the women's rights movement? From the sexual deviation of the 1970's?

There is a magic from ww1. Some baronlike spirit said that 'anyone not fighting here is either a woman or a child.' It was about 1914. That view has been maintained and the people of these eras have been naive or ideological, idealistic or immature, or nihilistic and greedy, or entirely socially centered, and now forming. The one who said that first phrase long ago is sexually inaccurate. We've been made as culture to reflect their terrible lack of faith, terror, and fear, and the oppression placed into others by those who are gangsters, like the serpentine defense alliances of Europe, c. 1900. We're being made to go through a social childhood to come up to speed with their statement. This is cruel reincarnation.

From the Cock: Fuck you. No, that is still centered on reliance on another. I don't care what you think. I'm fucking who I choose. I am who I choose.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home